Sunday, December 13, 2009
Abolish the Federal Department of Education?
This may sound radical, but the more I analyze the facts, the more reasons I see for abolishing the Federal Department of Education. I have provided some questions and answers that lead me to this conclusion. If you can come up with answers that prove that the benefits outweigh the costs of the Department of Education outweigh th I encourage you to post them.
Question 1: Is the the existence of the Federal Department of Education constitutional?
Answer 1: The federal role in education is a violation of the 10th amendment of the United States Constitution which states, “The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.” Nowhere in the Constitution is the federal government delegated the power to regulate or fund elementary or secondary education.
Question 2: But isn't the promotion of education a historic role of the federal government?
Answer 2: No, it was founded in 1979 by President Jimmy Carter, douchebag extraordinaire.
Question 3: Has the American public received a good return on its investment?
Answer 3: Between 2000 - 2008, under the "conservative" George W Bush, the Department of Education's budget increased from $37,524, 346 to $68,574,594, a whopping 54.72%. This represents a large increase in per-capita spending, coupled with little or no improvements in the academic performance of American students.
Question 4: Are there any good examples of federal government mandates improving the quality of public education at state and local levels?
Answer 4: I do not know of a good example. But, federal programs like"No Child Left Behind" have by most indications burdened cities and states with additional bureaucracy and hindered their autonomy, while offering few if any real improvements in the performance of students.
Question 5: What are some other possible consequences of the federalization of education?
Answer 5: Increased federal control of any activity usually leads to less local involvement of parents and teachers in addressing the educational ills that face their communities.