Thursday, February 10, 2011
Bizarro World of Multiculturalism
In England, a community organization that was created to "help women and children build multicultural friendships and empower them with knowledge about the local community" turned back two women and their children because they were British. The irony is that the women brought their children to the play group, because they wanted them to get to know "culturally diverse children." Grant it, this is an extreme case, but it does demonstrate that rather than foster "unity through diversity," government sponsored multiculturalism often erodes shared community and social cohesion and promotes ethnic separatism. And many of its proponents are unable or unwilling to recognize the contradictions in the programs that they support.
When this was brought to the administrator's attention, he refused to condemn the blatant act of exclusion. To highlight the bizarro double standards that some progressives hold, all you have to do is substitute one nationality for the one originally cited in in the director's response.
"There were ‘plenty of other alternatives for British / Pakistani Immigrants mothers in the town...We get the money on the basis it’s a group for ladies from other nations / who were born in England). We’re not sure they would give us the money if we were offering just the same services for local people / non-British people (...This isn’t racism. What we are doing is helping people from other countries / white people."
Clearly he is utilizing the appalling "separate but equal" argument that racist Americans used to justify segregation. At first I assumed the director's response was simply indicative of his own bizarre philosophical contradictions, but the response of the spokesman for the Communities Development Foundation demonstrates that it represented an institution wide philosophy:
"It is up to [Making Links] to say who can’t come."
The question to ask is if this individual would have also defended the institutional autonomy of a government funded organization that sought to exclude people of color? Only in the bizarro world is it possible to promote integration by encouraging separation. And only in the bizarro world do we not hold all groups equally accountable for their bigoted and exclusionary practices.
Two mothers and their toddler children banned from council-funded playgroup - for being BRITISH
By ANDREW LEVY
Last updated at 12:45 AM on 20th January 2011
Two British mothers have been banned from a publicly funded women’s group and creche because it was set up exclusively for foreigners.
Emma Knightley and Kimberley Wildman thought the group would be the ideal way for them and their children to make friends.
They were encouraged to come by a mixed-race friend who attends meetings despite being born and raised in Britain.
But when they arrived for their first session, a female volunteer told them they weren’t welcome because they were British-born.
The Making Links group in St Neots, Cambridgeshire, was set up to help integrate foreigners and their children aged under five into the community.
It receives money from the town council and the Department for Communities and Local Government.
But yesterday legal experts warned the group could be in breach of the Race Relations Act, and faces action in a civil court which could order it to pay compensation.
Shop worker Miss Knightley, 25, who lives in the town with her 21-month-old daughter Imogen, said: 'The first thing I was asked about was my nationality and when I said I was British I was told we had to leave‘.
‘She said “Are you not aware this is for foreign people only?” I said I knew it was trying to integrate people into the community but didn’t realise that meant British people and their children were banned.
‘I felt humiliated. You wouldn’t get away with a British-only mum and children’s group.’
Trainee midwife Miss Wildman, 27, who has two daughters, Georgia, five, and 18-month-old Olivia, added: ‘It’s a real shame.
‘I want my children to play with children from other races and integrate in the community because that stops discrimination.’
When the pair were challenged last week, Miss Knightley pointed out that their friend, who is of Indian and Malaysian descent, was born and bred in Britain too.
The volunteer replied: ‘But her parents aren’t.’
Ministers said the group was ‘divisive’ and ‘racist’.
Last night the Department of Communities and Local Government announced it would effectively abolish it by cutting its public funding.
Communities and local government minister Bob Neill said: ‘It is a real cause for concern that monies allocated for community development are being spent in such a divisive manner.
‘Rather than building good community relations, such an insensitive approach that seemingly discriminates against British people threatens to undermine community cohesion.’
Justice minister Jonathan Djanogly, whose Huntingdon constituency includes St Neots, added: ‘I’m upset to hear that constituents have had a racist experience. There is a question here of legality and also of sensitivity. Teaching people how to integrate involves allowing people to integrate.’
St Neots is in the heart of a region that has been a magnet for economic migrants in recent years because of the wealth of jobs available. These include vegetable picking on farms and food processing or packing work in factories. Making Links is run by a charity called Heart of the Community Trust and used by more than 70 women from 30 countries.
The group is staffed by volunteers and receives £11,000 each year from a variety of sources. St Neots Town Council gives £1,000, while Faiths in Action, which is funded by the Community Development Foundation, a quango answerable to the Department for Communities and Local Government, hands over £5,000.
On application forms it sent applying for funding, it said that its weekly sessions help free women and children from ‘feelings of isolation, help them build multicultural friendships and empower them with knowledge about the local community’.
Making Links administrator Roger Owen said there were ‘plenty of other alternatives for British mothers in the town’.
He added: ‘We get the money on the basis it’s a group for ladies from other nations. We’re not sure they would give us the money if we were offering just the same services for local people.
‘This isn’t racism. What we are doing is helping people from other countries.’
St Neots mayor Gordon Thorpe said officials had checked Making Links’ constitution before handing over its grant. A spokesman for the Communities Development Foundation said: ‘It is up to [Making Links] to say who can’t come. It is not in the terms of the grant.’
But a Department for Communities and Local Government spokesman said: ‘We will not be issuing new guidelines but this group is going to be abolished by withdrawing funding in future and its public body status will be removed.’
A source at the department added: ‘We have not been very impressed with what they have been doing. We think it is a misinformed decision they have taken.’
A spokesman for the Equalities and Human Rights Commission said: ‘Whether or not this group is breaking equality law is a matter for the court to decide.
‘However, under the Equality Act 2010 there have to be good reasons why some people are excluded from using a service such as this.’
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1348564/British-mothers-toddlers-banned-council-funded-playgroup-immigrants.html#ixzz1DdCciVUC